Noetis People · Business engine
Employee Policy Review Engine
Reviews employee policy documents for clarity and consistency.
Answers: "Can an engine check our handbook for clarity and internal consistency?" For people and hr teams.
Not employment law advice. Jurisdictional questions go to a qualified professional.
Available today
ImplementedImplemented: runs on the shared runtime with supplied material. One bounded development check on 2026-10-12 took 107.8s with 13 model calls and ended "incomplete". That is a development signal, not an evaluation. Customer access is by approved account.
What you send
- Question
- Supplied text material
- Text material up to 150,000 characters per run
What comes back
- Policy improvement report for human review.
- Findings with the located quote and a support status from claim review
- Release status: released, incomplete with reasons, or failed
- Executed roles, usage and measured cost
Sample
Authored illustration. Written by Encevra to show the workflow. Not customer data and not a recorded model output.
Review our remote work policy for conflicts and clarity.
Policy 3.1: staff may work remotely up to 2 days a week. Policy 3.4: remote days must be approved monthly by HR. Handbook 7.2: managers approve remote days. Policy does not say how equipment is provided.
- Sections that contradict each other, quoted side by side
- Terms used inconsistently across policies
- Questions that need jurisdiction specific professional review
The real response shape is documented in the API reference.
How the workflow operates
Each role is a responsibility in the workflow, served by a third party language model. More roles are not automatically better; depth and routing decide which run.
Models this engine uses: OpenAI (GPT), Anthropic (Claude). Specialists run on OpenAI models and the claim review and final brief on Anthropic models. If a provider has a temporary failure, the step can fall back to an OpenAI model, and the run records that.
Policy Mapper
Organize policies, scope and cross references.
Consistency Reviewer
Detect conflicting or outdated instructions.
Employee Experience Reviewer
Identify unclear processes and missing explanations.
Implementation Planner
Draft communication and rollout steps.
Evidence and deployment
Evidence
This engine reads the text you send in the request. Each released finding carries the exact quote and its character span in that text, located mechanically before release. Quotes that cannot be located are labelled Insufficient evidence and never shown as source verified. Interpretation is reviewed as a separate step, and gaps such as a missing clause describe what was searched instead of citing text that is not there.
Deployment
Runs on Encevra hosted infrastructure using the third party models listed above. Every model call and fallback is checked against the deployment policy first. Private cloud and air-gapped deployment are planned; discuss deployment requirements.
What it does not handle
- Applicant ranking
- Employee scoring
- Consequential employment decisions
- Uses only supplied material. No freshness guarantee beyond the documents provided.
- Required for every output during trials.
How to integrate
Send "engine": "people" with your question and material from your server. Keys stay server side.
How to evaluate it
No published result for this workflow yet. Build a small answer key from your own work and compare against a strong single model baseline. See the evaluation checklist and method.
Cost and rights: pricing and licensing. Showing outputs to your own customers needs a written agreement.
Related engines
- Compliance Evidence Mapping Engine
- Contract Review API for NDA and Vendor Agreements
- Public Policy Comparison Engine
Content reviewed 2026-10-12 by the Encevra engine team. Engine version 0.1.0 on noetis-core-1.


